Ryzen 1700 Vs Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 vs Ryzen five 2600
Price now 295$
Games supported 100%
Toll now 242$
Games supported 100%
General info
Comparing Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen v 2600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start fourth dimension and toll.
| Place in performance rating | 466 | 535 |
| Value for money | xx.22 | 26.65 |
| Marketplace segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Serial | AMD Ryzen 7 | AMD Ryzen v |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Zen+ (2018−2020) |
| Release date | ii March 2017 (5 years agone) | 13 April 2018 (four years ago) |
| Launch toll (MSRP) | $329 | $199 |
| Current price | $295 (0.9x MSRP) | $242 (1.2x MSRP) |
Value for money
To get the alphabetize nosotros compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.
Technical specs
Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 5 2600 basic parameters such every bit number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo heave clock, lithography, enshroud size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you take to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Cadre) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | sixteen | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | three.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | three.seven GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 16384 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Dice size | 192 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | iv,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | 1 | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen vii 1700 and Ryzen 5 2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (expect for socket blazon), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a time to come figurer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Annotation that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| Thermal blueprint power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen five 2600. You'll probably demand this data if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction gear up extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | FMA3 | no data |
| AVX | + | + |
| XFR | - | no data |
| SenseMI | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported past Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen v 2600 are enumerated here.
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 5 2600. Depending on the motherboards, higher retentiveness frequencies may exist supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum retention size | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Max retention channels | 2 | two |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/southward | 46.933 GB/s |
| ECC memory back up | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported past Ryzen seven 1700 and Ryzen 5 2600.
| PCIe version | n/a | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 20 |
Benchmark operation
Various criterion results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, college is ameliorate.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark operation rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak upward in comments section, we normally prepare problems quickly.
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Cadre
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- wPrime 32
- Cinebench eleven.5 64-scrap multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-scrap multi-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-cadre
- Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
- WinRAR 4.0
- x264 encoding laissez passer two
- x264 encoding pass one
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread criterion, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating betoken math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics adding. There is as well ane split single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single cadre version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: xx%
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited past xvi in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, ane dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX parcel.
Criterion coverage: 19%
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Criterion coverage: 18%
Cinebench Release xi.5 Multi Cadre is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: fourteen%
Cinebench R11.five is an one-time criterion past Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Information technology was superseded by later on versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Cadre version loads a single thread with ray tracing to return a glossy room total of crystal spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: thirteen%
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark fabricated past Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by afterwards versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Unmarried Cadre version (sometimes called Unmarried-Thread) merely uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and lite sources.
Benchmark coverage: thirteen%
TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, i of them beingness TrueCrypt AES, which measures information encryption speed using AES algorithm. Event is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: xiii%
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed examination, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in amend quality since the higher scrap rate is used when it is needed more than. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
Criterion coverage: 12%
x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 pinch method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant flake rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per 2nd, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
Gaming performance
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 14.72 | 13.15 |
| Novelty | 2 March 2017 | 13 April 2018 |
| Cost | $329 | $199 |
| Boost clock speed | 3700 | 3900 |
| Base of operations clock speed | 3000 | 3400 |
| Scrap lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical Metropolis recommends
AMD Ryzen seven 1700
Should you withal take questions on selection between Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 5 2600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall reply.
Bandage your vote
Exercise you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" push button virtually your favourite CPU.
Competitors of Ryzen 7 1700 past Intel
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Ryzen 7 1700 from Intel is Cadre 2 Extreme QX6850, which is faster by 1% and higher past 4 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest Intel rivals to Ryzen 7 1700:
Competitors of Ryzen v 2600 by Intel
Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to Ryzen v 2600 from Intel is Core 2 Extreme QX6700, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating.
Here are some closest Intel rivals to Ryzen 5 2600:
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the aforementioned market segment and functioning relatively shut to those reviewed on this folio.
User rating
Here yous tin encounter how users rate the processors, as well as charge per unit them yourself.
Rate AMD Ryzen seven 1700 on a calibration of ane to 5:
Rate AMD Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of ane to 5:
Questions and comments
Here you tin inquire a question about Ryzen vii 1700 or Ryzen 5 2600, concur or disagree with our judgements, or written report an error or mismatch.
Graphics settings
Screen resolution
FPS
Source: https://technical.city/en/cpu/Ryzen-7-1700-vs-Ryzen-5-2600
Posted by: howardsciallsolle.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Ryzen 1700 Vs Ryzen 5 2600"
Post a Comment