I5 2500k Vs Ryzen 5 2400g
Toll now 234$ Games supported 97% Price now 168$ Games supported 78% Comparison Ryzen 5 2400G and Core i5-2500K processor marketplace type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start fourth dimension and cost. Value for money To get the alphabetize we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into business relationship the cost of other processors. Ryzen 5 2400G and Core i5-2500K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base of operations frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, enshroud size and multiplier lock land. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise cess you have to consider their test results. Data on Ryzen five 2400G and Core i5-2500K compatibility with other estimator components: motherboard (look for socket blazon), power supply unit (look for ability consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future reckoner configuration or upgrading an existing one. Annotation that ability consumption of some processors tin well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their alleged thermals given that the motherboard allows to melody the CPU ability parameters. Technological solutions and boosted instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Core i5-2500K. You'll probably need this information if you crave some particular applied science. Ryzen v 2400G and Cadre i5-2500K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks. Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported past Ryzen 5 2400G and Core i5-2500K are enumerated hither. Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Core i5-2500K. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may exist supported. General parameters of integrated GPUs, if whatever. Specifications and connection of peripherals supported past Ryzen 5 2400G and Core i5-2500K. Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is amend. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you lot find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak upward in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of viii different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics adding. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core functioning. Criterion coverage: 68% Criterion coverage: 37% Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its unmarried cadre version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorbike. Benchmark coverage: 20% Cinebench Release 10 Multi Cadre is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is express by 16 in this version. Criterion coverage: 19% 3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains ii scenarios, 1 defended to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX parcel. Benchmark coverage: nineteen% wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of offset 32 meg integer numbers. Its upshot is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark event, the faster the processor. Benchmark coverage: eighteen% Cinebench Release 11.five Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version. Criterion coverage: 17% Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads. Benchmark coverage: 14% Cinebench R15 (continuing for Release xv) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Movie house 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more than modern variants of Movie house 4D engine. The Single Cadre version (sometimes called Single-Thread) but uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and calorie-free sources. Criterion coverage: xiii% Cryptocurrency mining operation of Ryzen 5 2400G and Core i5-2500K. Usually measured in megahashes per 2d. Judging by the results of constructed and gaming tests, Technical City recommends AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Should you however have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2400G and Cadre i5-2500K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Practice you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote past clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU. Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to Ryzen 5 2400G from Intel is Cadre i3-10100, which is nearly equal in speed and college by three positions in our rating. Here are some closest Intel rivals to Ryzen 5 2400G: Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i5-2500K from AMD is Athlon 200GE, which is nearly equal in speed and college by iii positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to Cadre i5-2500K: We picked several like comparisons of processors in the aforementioned marketplace segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page. Here you tin can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself. Rate AMD Ryzen 5 2400G on a scale of one to v: Rate Intel Core i5-2500K on a calibration of i to 5: Hither y'all can ask a question most Ryzen 5 2400G or Core i5-2500K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSAMD Ryzen v 2400G vs Intel Cadre i5-2500K
General info
Place in performance rating 755 1345 Value for money 15.65 1.03 Market segment Desktop processor Desktop processor Series AMD Ryzen 5 Cadre i5 (Desktop) Compages codename Raven Ridge (2017−2018) Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) Release appointment 12 February 2018 (4 years ago) 9 Jan 2011 (xi years ago) Launch toll (MSRP) $169 $289 Current price $234 (1.4x MSRP) $168 (0.6x MSRP) Technical specs
Physical cores 4 (Quad-Cadre) 4 (Quad-Core) Threads 8 four Base of operations clock speed 3.half-dozen GHz three.iii GHz Boost clock speed 3.9 GHz 3.seven GHz L1 cache 128K (per core) 64 KB (per core) L2 cache 512K (per core) 256 KB (per core) L3 cache 4 MB (shared) 6144 KB (shared) Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm Dice size 210 mm2 216 mmii Maximum core temperature no information 73 °C Number of transistors iv,950 million 1,160 1000000 64 flake support + + Windows 11 compatibility - - Unlocked multiplier one + Compatibility
Number of CPUs in a configuration 1 (Uniprocessor) one Socket AM4 LGA1155 Thermal design power (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt Technologies and extensions
Education fix extensions XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.two, AVX2, SMT Intel® SSE4.one, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX AES-NI + + FMA + no information AVX + + vPro no data - Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) no data + Turbo Boost Technology no data 2.0 Hyper-Threading Technology no data - Idle States no information + Thermal Monitoring no information + Flex Memory Access no information + FDI no information + Fast Retentiveness Admission no data + Security technologies
TXT no data - EDB no data + Identity Protection no data + Virtualization technologies
AMD-V + no data VT-d no information - VT-x no data + EPT no data + Retentivity specs
Supported memory types DDR4 Dual-aqueduct DDR3 Maximum memory size 64 GB 32 GB Max memory channels 2 2 Maximum memory bandwidth 46.933 GB/southward 21 GB/s ECC memory support + - Graphics specifications
Peripherals
PCIe version 3.0 ii.0 PCI Express lanes 12 16 Benchmark performance
Overall score
Mining hashrates
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) no data 14 Mh/southward Gaming functioning
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating 8.66 4.07 Novelty 12 February 2018 9 Jan 2011 Cost $169 $289 Boost clock speed 3900 3700 Base of operations clock speed 3600 3300 Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm Thermal blueprint power (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt
Cast your vote
Competitors of Ryzen five 2400G by Intel
Competitors of Core i5-2500K by AMD
Similar processor comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/cpu/Ryzen-5-2400G-vs-Core-i5-2500K
Posted by: howardsciallsolle.blogspot.com
0 Response to "I5 2500k Vs Ryzen 5 2400g"
Post a Comment